ie Film comparison compare contrastHeart of Darkness and Apocalypse Now

Heart of Darkness, a novel by Joseph Conrad, and Apocalypse Now, a
movie by Francis Ford Coppola can be compared and contrasted in many ways.
By focusing on their endings and on the character of Kurtz, contrasting the
meanings of the horror in each media emerges. In the novel the horror
reflects Kurtz tragedy of transforming into a ruthless animal whereas in
the film the horror has more of a definite meaning, reflecting the war and
all the barbaric fighting that is going on.

Conrad’s Heart of Darkness, deals with the account of Marlow, a
narrator of a journey up the Congo River into the heart of Africa, into the
jungle, his ultimate destination. Marlow is commissioned as an ivory agent
and is sent to ivory stations along the river. Marlow is told that when he
arrives at the inner station he is to bring back information about Kurtz,
the basis of this comparison and contrast in this paper, who is the great
ivory agent, and who is said to be sick. As Marlow proceeds away to the
inner station “to the heart of the mighty big river…. resembling an
immense snake uncoiled, with its head in the sea, its body at rest curving
afar over a vast country and its tail lost in the depths of the land”
(Dorall 303), he hears rumors of Kurtz’s unusual behavior of killing the
Africans. The behavior fascinates him, especially when he sees it first
hand: “and there it was black, dried, sunken, with closed eyelids- a head
that seemed to sleep at the top of that pole, and with the shrunken dry
lips showing a narrow white line of the teeth, was smiling too, smiling
continuously at some endless and jocose dream of that eternal
slumber”(Conrad 57). These heads that Marlow sees are first hand evidence
of Kurtz’s unusual behavior. The novel ends with Kurtz “gradually engulfing
the atrocities of the other agents in his own immense horror”(Dorall 303).
At his dying moment, Kurtz utters “The Horror! The Horror!’, which for the
novel are words reflecting the tragedy of Kurtz, and his transformation
into an animal.

Apocalypse Now is a movie that is similarly structured to the book
but has many different meanings. The movie takes place during the Vietnam
War. The narrator is Captain Willard, who is given a mission to locate and
kill Colonel Kurtz, who is said to be in Cambodia killing the Vietcong,
South Vietnamese and the Cambodians. Willard journeys up the Nung river to
find Kurtz, and eventually finds and kills him. Kurtz’s words “The Horror!,
The Horror!” in the film have a different meaning from the novel. Their
meaning is not definite though and could only be understood by taking a
deeper look at the character of Kurtz this film.

At the point when Willard, from Apocalypse Now, and Marlow from
Heart of Darkness, meet up with their Kurtzes, the two media break off from
their similar structure and start to develop differently. The Kurtz in
Conrad’s novel is told to be “a universal genius,…the flower of European
Civilization”(Conrad qtd. in LaBrasca 289). Kurtz becomes a beacon of hope
for Marlow who is searching for him amid much heat, bugs, natives and
immense fog. Marlow approaches Kurtz’s place of refuge, described as “the
shack of the ‘universal genius’ surrounded by a crude row of posts, holding
high the severed heads of ‘rebels(Africans)”(Conrad qtd. in Labrasca 290).
From these words we can see that Kurtz is no ordinary man. Kurtz himself
was described as “an animated image of death carved out of old
ivory”(Conrad qtd. in Labrasca 290). Essentially Kurtz has succumbed to
disease and starvation, and is basically being eaten alive as he nears
death. He had such a greed for ivory also. Kurtz exclaims “My intended, my
i vory, my station my river…”(Conrad 67). He believes that everything is
his that he had control. Marlow really can’t believe that Kurtz thought
that everything belonged to him. Marlow’s response “Everything belonged to
him. It made me hold my breath in expectation of hearing the wilderness
burst into a prodigious laughter…”(Conrad 67) gives us a sense that Marlow
really believes that Kurtz has taken on this idea that everything belongs
to him. Saying that everything belonged to him is quite insignificant
though. What we should know is what did he belong to, “How many powers of
darkness claimed him for their own”(Dorall 304). Kurtz was the victim of
the jungle he was in.

Kurtz who set out for Africa carrying the light of European
civilization at its brightest, came face to face with the essential animal
nature of man, over which civilization is mere clothing, and that then,
with his typical ruthless honesty, he cast off his ideals and humanity and
dared to live at the other extreme, as the total animal Darwin and the
naturalists said he really was; he tore down the facade behind which the
other colonialists sheltered, and converted metaphor into brutal fact, not
only devouring Africa, as they did, but, very specifically, devouring
Africans.(Dorall 305-306)

Dorall essentially summarizes the Kurtz of The Heart of Darkness.
Kurtz was out to bring civilization to the Africans, but in time is
engulfed by the animal like nature of everyone in the jungle, and he too
becomes brutal like them, eventually killing many of them off. At this
point we can bring in the famous quote mentioned earlier. The words “The
Horror! The Horror!” uttered by Kurtz can be reflected to his tragedy.
After a long period of time of taking on the animal nature and killing and
making the Africans suffer, he faces the consequences and eventually loses
his identity, who he really was and why he came there. As the critic Dorall
puts it “unable to be totally beast and never again able to be fully human,
he alternated between trying to return to the jungle and recalling in
grotesque terms his for idealism”(305) Kurtz essentially has been
overtaken and can never go back to the ideal human state. “Oh he struggled,
he struggled….The shade of the original Kurtz frequented the bedside of the
hollow sham whose fate it was to be buried presently in the mould of
primeval earth…..but both the diabolic love and the unearthly hate of the
mysteries it had penetrated fought for the possession of that soul satiated
with primitive emotions, avid lying fame….of all the appearances of success
and power”(Dorall 306). Kurtz is lost amid all his power , and his soul is
to be taken. And as his soul is taken by a higher power, Kurtz’s last words,
“The Horror! The Horror!”(Dorall 306), “epitomize” his whole experience of
killing and hurting the Africans. This Kurtz of Conrad’s novel says his
last words as a message to the Africans and secondarily as a message to
himself because he sees the horror that he created for the Africans. Before
these words were uttered an explanation was never given to Marlow. It may
be hard to given a definite meaning to this quote as said by critic William
M. Hagen, but by looking at Marlow’s reactions, we can speculate. The
horror may simply mean all the anguish caused to the Africa ns by Kurtz.
The horror may have different meanings to different people, but in my
opinion the horror was Kurtz’s downfall, and his transformation from a sane
man into a totally different person, essentially an animal.

Now we can shift gears to “Apocalypse Now” by Francis Ford Coppola.
In Conrad we saw that Kurtz was driven by greed for ivory. Coppola’s Kurtz
though “has come to the crystalline revelation that there is some ultimate
truth in the willingness to employ absolutely ruthless means in the
accomplishment of one’s will. It is a sociopathic insight and,
unfortunately, the strongest viewpoint articulated in the film”(LaBrasca
291). Kurtz in the film sees that there is truth in being quite ruthless to
get something done. This same view is almost a similarity to the novel,
because the Kurtz in the novel, became quite ruthless ending up killing
many Africans, although he didn’t plan to. In the Camp of Kurtz in the
movie there are very few human heads and they don’t have the significance
as they did in the novel. Kurtz’s problem in the movie is a military one.
The film is about war, not about colonization as from the novel. Kurtz is
the ideal commander, who basically is “destined to rise in the military
hiera rchy”(Dorall 306). This was his goal, till an event changed his life.
Kurtz was essentially sent up in Cambodia to inoculate the children, and
was horrified to find out that the Vietcong cut off all the inoculated arms.
At this point Kurtz comes to face his own darkness. He says “that a war can
be fought successfully only if one learns to come to terms with ‘horror and
moral terror'”(Dorall 306). Kurtz turns his men into “pure fighting
machines”(Dorall 306) and becomes a ruthless person. Kurtz claims that one
can win if one eliminates all human feeling in favor of total ruthlessness.
Kurtz does eliminate all human feeling, and eventually as we see, does
become ruthless. As in the Heart of Darkness, this Kurtz has found the
consequence of fighting like an animal and rejecting his old ways.
Essentially life for him has become meaningless and quite empty. And also
as in the novel, this Kurtz goes to face the darkness and is ultimately
engulfed by it. Kurtz can be represented as “the sick god of his tribe”(Do
rall 307). All the people of Cambodia see him as their leader. Willard is
sent here to kill Kurtz and can be identified as the “Quester”(Dorall 307),
so as to free the people from Kurtz rule. As Willard kills Kurtz we hear
the famous quote as from the novel. “The Horror! The Horror!” in the novel
is much more simple though. Marlow was sent to bring Kurtz back, not to
kill him. Going back to the movie we can see that after Willard kills Kurtz
he doesn’t take over his rule but leaves. Now we can go back the quote. In
the movie “The Horror! The Horror!” has much more of a definite meaning
than in the novel, although it is not something that we can easily

It’s a search-a search through the bloody holocaust that is our
nightmare of Vietnam, a search through all the myths and motifs of Western
literature and movies, a search along a glistening river surrounded by
shadows, a search toward death and dissolution.(Wilmington 288)

Wilmington can give us some categorization of what the horror might
mean in the movie, but the only way to get the definition and make it our
definition is to actually see the horror around Kurtz. The war that is
going on is very much the horror. All the fighting and barbaric atmosphere
in the eyes of Kurtz indicate a continuing horror throughout the ending.
“The way to judgment lies through vicarious violence. Judgment is self
judgment”(Hagen 294). Hagen’s argument that judgment lies through violence,
basically tells what is happening in the war. Judgment is what you judge of
yourself. The horror of what is going on around Kurtz is terrible. As laid
out in this paper, we can see that the Kurtz of the movie is quite
different from the Kurtz in the novel. In summary, we can say that the two
Kurtzes often did act and talk alike. Both of them asked a higher authority
to send them to their assignment, and both of them had broken away from
their original selves and have become people they didn’t intend
to be. Willard puts it in words for both Kurtzes saying “He broke away
from all thathuman society and then broke away from himself'(Dorall 304).
In conclusion, in both the novel and the film, “Kurtz is little more than a
voice, which instructs Marlow-Willard for some days and finally expires
after muttering the now famous last words, ‘The Horror! The Horror!’
“(Dorall 304).

As all this evidence proves, Francis Ford Coppola had a similar
mind pattern to that of Joseph Conrad’s, but chose to extend his ending
differently, by having Kurtz killed rather than dying and also by taking on
a new meaning for the horror. This meaning being the war that is going on
and of the terrible fighting and barbaric atmosphere. Reading the book and
watching the movie tell us many things about each Kurtz, and there are some
things which we can deduce by ourselves. Well, as concluded we can see that
Kurtz was an animal to some extent. Bringing back the idea of a
transformation, we know that he once was a sane man. To know if he really
meant to do what he did we need to formulate our own opinion. I don’t think
he did mean to do it, but nevertheless it was done and Kurtz in either
media was an animal.